Student Solution

-->

"Education is the most powerful weapon which you can use to change the world”
– Nelson Mandela

1 University

1 Course

1 Subject

Discussion Board 4 - What Takes Precedence - Public Safety Or The Absolute Preservation Of A Right to Privacy

Discussion Board 4 - What Takes Precedence - Public Safety Or The Absolute Preservation Of A Right to Privacy

Q After the terrorist attacks of September 11th, 2001, the United States Congress, at the request of then-President George W. Bush, passed the USA Patriot Act of 2001. Signed immediately into law by then-President Bush, it granted sweeping powers to federal, state, and local law enforcement relative to the investigation of potential terrorist-related activity. Some of these provisions, including allowing for roving wiretaps, were perceived by some to constitute a violation of the right to privacy understood to be held by Americans. Now, it is important to point out that there is no explicit right to privacy stipulated in the Constitution. However, we do have a right to privacy, but it is implied through judicial interpretation. That being said, the USA Patriot Act initiated a discussion in this country; what takes precedence - public safety or the absolute preservation of civil liberties, specifically our right to privacy? For your initial post to get the discussion started, I ask you the question: What should take precedence? The preservation of civil liberties or public safety in the name of combating terrorism? There is no "right or wrong" answer here; however, it is imperative that you substantiate your commentary. For this assignment, you are to make three posts. Your first, initial post is to be posted by 11:59 pm on Wednesday of this week, and is to be a minimum of 200 words. You are then to make, at minimum, two follow-up posts, responding to the initial posts of two other students of your choice. Each one of these follow-up posts are to be, at minimum, 75 words each, and are to be posted by 11:59 pm on Sunday of this week. A simple "I agree" post or "Good post" post is not sufficient. While it is completely acceptable to agree (or disagree) with another student, it is important to substantiate your position. Remember, you will never be "graded" on your opinions in this course. However, you will be assessed on your effort and if you meet the minimum requirements for these posts. Have fun with these posts! They are designed to simulate discussion as students would have in an actual, physical classroom environment. Please remember to use proper "netiquette" and be considerate and courteous to one another. Abusive language or insults will not be tolerated.

View Related Questions

Solution Preview

I think that there must be a balance of both. This can be done by ensuring that the citizens are made aware of the things they must not be doing. For example, acquiring and keeping of illegal arms and ammunition. There must be protection of privacy by ensuring that the personal photos, images or videos of the citizens are not made public. There can be special family members designated by the government officials by taking into confidence of the suspect. This can ensure that all the media content about the suspect can be viewed by a family member and then the family member can narrate about anything suspicious about the suspect. The designated family member must be put through a lie-detector test so that the family member can be caught for lying to save the suspect.